World  »  Romania  »  Bihor  »  Tulca

Tulca

Area of Tulca 57.5 km²
Population 2,515
Male Population 1,243 (49.4%)
Female Population 1,272 (50.6%)
Population change from 1975 to 2015  -4.4%
Population change from 2000 to 2015  -15.3%
Median Age 39.1 years old
Male Median Age 37.9 years old
Female Median Age 40.3 years old
Timezone Eastern European Summer Time

Tulca Population

Years 1975 to 2015
Data1975199020002015
Population 2,631 3,035 2,971 2,515
Population Density 45.8 / km² 52.8 / km² 51.7 / km² 43.7 / km²
Sources: JRC (European Commission's Joint Research Centre) work on the GHS built-up grid

Tulca Population change from 2000 to 2015

Decrease of 15.3% from year 2000 to 2015
LocationChange since 1975Change since 1990Change since 2000
Tulca -4.4% -17.1% -15.3%
Bihor -4.1% -16.9% -15.1%
Romania -10% -16.9% -11.8%
Sources: JRC (European Commission's Joint Research Centre) work on the GHS built-up grid

Tulca Median Age

Median Age: 39.1 years
LocationMedian AgeMedian Age (Male)Median Age (Female)
Tulca 39.1 years 37.9 years 40.3 years
Bihor 39.2 years 37.5 years 40.8 years
Sources: CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network)

Tulca Population Tree

Population By Age and Gender
AgeMaleFemaleTotal
Under 5 69 72 141
5-9 79 84 163
10-14 82 84 167
15-19 87 74 162
20-24 87 56 144
25-29 64 71 135
30-34 87 92 180
35-39 113 98 211
40-44 110 80 190
45-49 65 59 125
50-54 61 85 146
55-59 79 74 154
60-64 85 94 179
65-69 46 67 113
70-74 54 66 121
75-79 38 48 87
80-84 27 43 71
85 Plus 11 24 35
Sources: CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network)

Tulca Population Density

Population Density: 43.7 / km²
LocationPopulationAreaPopulation Density
Tulca 2,515 57.5 km² 43.7 / km²
Bihor 525,746 7,536.7 km² 69.8 / km²
Sources: JRC (European Commission's Joint Research Centre) work on the GHS built-up grid

Tulca Historical and Projected Population

Estimated Ancient Population until 2100
YearEst. PopulationAvg 10 year growth %Avg 10 year growth
0 106 n/a n/a
100 106 0% 0
200 106 0% 0
300 93 -1.3% -1
400 80 -1.5% -1
500 73 -0.9% 0
600 67 -0.9% 0
700 73 0.9% 0
800 80 0.9% 0
900 93 1.5% 1
1000 106 1.3% 1
1100 119 1.2% 1
1200 133 1.1% 1
1300 199 4.1% 6
1400 166 -1.8% -3
1500 265 4.8% 9
1600 265 0% 0
1700 331 2.2% 6
1800 899 10.5% 56
1900 1,857 7.5% 95
1910 1,994 7.4% 137
1920 2,060 3.3% 66
1930 2,364 14.8% 304
1940 2,362 -0.1% -2
1950 2,396 1.4% 34
1960 2,537 5.9% 141
1970 2,584 1.9% 47
1990 3,035 8.4% 225
2000 2,971 -2.1% -64
2020 2,394 -10.2% -288
2030 2,168 -9.4% -226
2040 1,959 -9.6% -209
2050 1,764 -10% -195
2060 1,574 -10.8% -190
2070 1,392 -11.6% -182
2080 1,234 -11.4% -158
2090 1,108 -10.2% -126
2100 1,011 -8.8% -97
Sources:
1. JRC (European Commission's Joint Research Centre) work on the GHS built-up grid
2. CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network)
3. [Link] Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Doelman, J., and Stehfest, E.: Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 927–953, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-927-2017, 2017.

Human Development Index (HDI)

Statistic composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income.
Sources: [Link] Kummu, M., Taka, M. & Guillaume, J. Gridded global datasets for Gross Domestic Product and Human Development Index over 1990–2015. Sci Data 5, 180004 (2018) doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.4

Tulca CO2 Emissions

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Per Capita in Tonnes Per Year
LocationCO2 EmissionsCO2 Emissions Per CapitaCO2 Emissions Intensity
Tulca 12,131 t 4.82 t 211 t/km²
Bihor 2,547,453 t 4.85 t 338 t/km²
Sources: [Link] Moran, D., Kanemoto K; Jiborn, M., Wood, R., Többen, J., and Seto, K.C. (2018) Carbon footprints of 13,000 cities. Environmental Research Letters DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac72a

Natural Hazards Risk

Relative risk out of 10
Drought Low (2)
Flood High (8)
Earthquake Low (2)
* Risk, particularly concerning flood or landslide, may not be for the entire area.
Sources:
1. Dilley, M., R.S. Chen, U. Deichmann, A.L. Lerner-Lam, M. Arnold, J. Agwe, P. Buys, O. Kjekstad, B. Lyon, and G. Yetman. 2005. Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5930-4.
2. Center for Hazards and Risk Research - CHRR - Columbia University, Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University. 2005. Global Flood Hazard Frequency and Distribution. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4668B3D.
3. Center for Hazards and Risk Research - CHRR - Columbia University, Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University, and International Research Institute for Climate and Society - IRI - Columbia University. 2005. Global Drought Hazard Frequency and Distribution. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4VX0DFT.
4. Center for Hazards and Risk Research - CHRR - Columbia University, Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University. 2005. Global Earthquake Hazard Distribution - Peak Ground Acceleration. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4BZ63ZS.

Top places in Tulca

Other places in Bihor

Place Area Population Population Density
Abram 67.6 km² 2,568 38.0 / km²
Abrămuț 45.6 km² 2,859 62.7 / km²
Aleșd 72.5 km² 9,120 125.8 / km²
Aușeu 72.5 km² 2,770 38.2 / km²
Avram Iancu 79.5 km² 3,009 37.8 / km²
Aștileu 56 km² 3,115 55.6 / km²
Balc 78.1 km² 2,990 38.3 / km²
Batăr 126.7 km² 4,502 35.5 / km²
Beiuș 24.9 km² 9,703 389.1 / km²
Biharia 58.5 km² 3,833 65.5 / km²
Boianu Mare 41.7 km² 1,228 29.5 / km²
Borod 105.8 km² 3,596 34.0 / km²
Borș 43.3 km² 3,731 86.1 / km²
Bratca 134.2 km² 4,572 34.1 / km²
Brusturi 103.4 km² 3,168 30.6 / km²
Budureasa 318.2 km² 2,380 7.48 / km²
Buduslău 43.6 km² 1,744 40.0 / km²
Bulz 143.5 km² 1,948 13.6 / km²
Buntești 72.2 km² 3,885 53.8 / km²
Cefa 76.8 km² 2,064 26.9 / km²
Ceica 81.8 km² 3,297 40.3 / km²
Cetariu 68.8 km² 2,012 29.3 / km²
Cherechiu 54.2 km² 2,209 40.8 / km²
Chișlaz 78.3 km² 2,969 37.9 / km²
Ciuhoi 57.1 km² 2,164 37.9 / km²
Ciumeghiu 109 km² 3,970 36.4 / km²
Cociuba Mare 72.9 km² 2,578 35.4 / km²
Copăcel 75.9 km² 2,102 27.7 / km²
Criștioru de Jos 105.8 km² 1,275 12.1 / km²
Curtuișeni 69.3 km² 3,458 49.9 / km²
Curățele 90.8 km² 2,304 25.4 / km²
Câmpani 45.9 km² 2,246 48.9 / km²
Căbești 71.7 km² 1,670 23.3 / km²
Căpâlna 54.3 km² 1,526 28.1 / km²
Cărpinet 68.9 km² 1,791 26.0 / km²
Derna 49 km² 2,391 48.8 / km²
Diosig 91.6 km² 6,227 68.0 / km²
Dobrești 132.3 km² 4,856 36.7 / km²
Drăgești 52.4 km² 2,337 44.6 / km²
Drăgănești 37.7 km² 2,855 75.8 / km²
Finiș 103.9 km² 3,355 32.3 / km²
Gepiu 42.4 km² 1,656 39.1 / km²
Girișu de Criș 44.7 km² 3,283 73.5 / km²
Hidișelu de Sus 90.8 km² 3,036 33.5 / km²
Holod 67.2 km² 3,015 44.9 / km²
Husasău de Tinca 119.4 km² 2,203 18.4 / km²
Ineu 50.2 km² 4,025 80.1 / km²
Lazuri de Beiuş 59.4 km² 1,408 23.7 / km²
Lugașu de Jos 57 km² 3,378 59.3 / km²
Lunca 70 km² 2,638 37.7 / km²
Lăzăreni 79.8 km² 2,940 36.8 / km²
Marghita 84.1 km² 14,312 170.1 / km²
Mădăraș 94.6 km² 2,608 27.6 / km²
Măgești 51.4 km² 2,462 47.9 / km²
Nojorid 122.8 km² 4,760 38.8 / km²
Nucet 40.9 km² 1,945 47.5 / km²
Olcea 88.2 km² 2,538 28.8 / km²
Oradea 115.2 km² 178,729 1,551 / km²
Oșorhei 65 km² 6,058 93.2 / km²
Paleu 49.3 km² 2,668 54.2 / km²
Petroasa 168.1 km² 2,910 17.3 / km²
Pocola 24 km² 1,449 60.3 / km²
Pomezeu 54.7 km² 2,650 48.5 / km²
Popești 109.8 km² 6,770 61.7 / km²
Remetea 66.6 km² 2,662 40.0 / km²
Rieni 67.6 km² 2,586 38.2 / km²
Roșia 74.1 km² 2,201 29.7 / km²
Roșiori 47.4 km² 2,845 60.0 / km²
Răbăgani 36.5 km² 1,892 51.9 / km²
Salonta 172.6 km² 16,145 93.5 / km²
Sambata 29.9 km² 1,352 45.2 / km²
Spinuș 30 km² 1,175 39.2 / km²
Suplacu de Barcau 43.6 km² 3,962 90.9 / km²
Székelyhíd 150.6 km² 10,544 70.0 / km²
Sânmartin 61.7 km² 8,830 143.1 / km²
Sânnicolau Român 74.4 km² 2,021 27.2 / km²
Sântandrei 26.3 km² 4,329 164.4 / km²
Sârbi 63.1 km² 2,342 37.1 / km²
Săcădat 43.4 km² 1,773 40.9 / km²
See More
The data on this page is estimated using a number of publicly available tools and resources. It is provided without warranty, and could contain inaccuracies.